Side-by-side comparison of specifications and features
Compare visual case presence and physical footprint on one shared wrist. Measure your top-down wrist width for a stronger result; lug-to-lug is used when the catalog has it.
Medium (6.7″)
Estimated top width: 56.7 mm
Preliminary range: 54.7–61.8 mm.
Watch A
Visual presence
ModerateCase covers 62% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 8.9 mm per side.
Watch B
Visual presence
ModerateCase covers 65% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 6.5 mm per side.
Proportional guide only: visual presence and physical footprint do not predict comfort. Weight, thickness, caseback shape, rigid lugs, strap stiffness, wrist-bone prominence, wearing tension, bezel design, and case curvature change how a watch actually wears. Non-round silhouettes use a verified family shape and catalog dimensions where available; missing case height or width is estimated from a conservative family aspect ratio.
Start with the specifications that meaningfully differ. Expand the complete table for reference details and missing-data context.
| Specification | Casio Analog | Casio W-800H |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| MSRPAnalog is $29.1 less at MSRP | $20 | $49 |
| New PriceAnalog is $32.5 less based on the current snapshot | $32 | $64 |
| Used Price (Low)Analog is $28.7 less at the low end | $12 | $41 |
| Used Price (High) | $150 | $45 |
| 30-Day Trend | ↑ +16.1% | ↑ +64.9% |
| Used Price Range | $12 - $150 | $41 - $45 |
| Identity | ||
| Style | Casual | Digital, Tool, Casual |
| Dimensions | ||
| DiameterAnalog is 2.1mm smaller | 34.9mm | 37mm |
| ThicknessAnalog is 5.6mm thinner | 7.8mm | 13.4mm |
| WeightAnalog is 17g lighter | 20g | 37g |
| Case | ||
| Water ResistanceW-800H adds 70m water resistance | 30m (splash resistant) | 100m (recreational diving) |
| Dial | ||
| Dial Color | White | Black |
2 fields are excluded from the differences view because one watch lacks comparable data. Use “All specs” to inspect those gaps.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) and Casio W-800H can overlap on price or use case, but the buying decision usually comes down to wrist presence versus easier fit, water-ready utility versus dressier everyday wear, casual character versus digital versatility. They both touch the casual use case, so smaller spec differences can matter more than brand preference.
Bottom line
Fit is a real separator here — compare case width and lug-to-lug before deciding, especially if wrist comfort matters more than headline features. Choose Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) if you want a smaller case footprint on the wrist; choose Casio W-800H if you prefer more dial presence and a larger case feel.
Choose Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) when
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is a better fit for smaller wrists, low-maintenance daily wear, casual styling.
Choose Casio W-800H when
Casio W-800H is a better fit for buyers who want more wrist presence, low-maintenance daily wear, digital styling.
Movement and upkeep
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): quartz movement
Casio W-800H: quartz movement
Both use the same movement type, so maintenance differences are limited and fit or feature details should decide the purchase.
Size and wearability
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): 34.9mm · L2L 38.8mm · 20g
Casio W-800H: 37mm · 37g
Fit is a real separator here — compare case width and lug-to-lug before deciding, especially if wrist comfort matters more than headline features.
Water resistance
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): 30m
Casio W-800H: 100m
Water resistance is a meaningful separator here — the higher-rated option gives more flexibility for swimming or rougher daily use.
Price and value
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): $20
Casio W-800H: $42
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.
Style and use case
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): casual
Casio W-800H: digital
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) leans more casual, while Casio W-800H pulls toward digital use case — pick the one that matches how you will actually wear it.
Crystal and materials
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): acrylic crystal · resin
Casio W-800H: acrylic crystal · resin
Materials are broadly similar, so finish, fit, and price will matter more than the materials list alone.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) and Casio W-800H get compared constantly because both are casual watches, they share the same quartz movement — so the spec sheet alone will not tell you which to buy.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 20g and Casio W-800H is 37g — a 17g gap is noticeable over a full day.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) for most buyers — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 20g and Casio W-800H is 37g — a 17g gap is noticeable over a full day.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is often the value play at current pricing, while Casio W-800H makes more sense if you will use its extra features regularly.
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.
Check current deals on Amazon and eBay using the buttons below — listing prices, seller quality, and condition can change quickly.
Prices change often, so compare the latest listings and condition options before you buy.
WatchCompared may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links. This does not change your price.
Casio Analog
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Casio W-800H
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) — it is 34.9mm wide versus 37mm. Thickness is 7.8mm vs 13.4mm, which also affects how it sits.
Casio W-800H — it is rated 100m versus 30m, which is the difference between swimming confidently and only handling splashes.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is the value pick at roughly $23 less. Pay more only if a specific difference above matters to you — otherwise the cheaper one is the smarter buy. Confirm live listings, since marketplace pricing moves.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 20g and Casio W-800H is 37g — a 17g gap is noticeable over a full day. That is the difference you will notice day to day; the rest of the specs are close enough not to matter.
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) for most buyers — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 20g and Casio W-800H is 37g — a 17g gap is noticeable over a full day.
Evidence & Method
This page currently relies on normalized catalog fields and calculated differences. No external reviewer observation is used in its verdict.
Compare Watches
Start a new multi-watch comparison
Compare Watch Prices
US-focused price comparison workflow
Watch Fit Chart
Size and wrist-fit guidance
Related Budget Page
Compare similar watches in the same price band
Watch Buying Guides
Read movement, fit, and buying guides before deciding
Smartwatch Compare Hub
Compare Apple, Garmin, Samsung, and more if you are cross-shopping smartwatches
Casio A158 vs Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex)
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) vs Casio F-91W
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) vs Timex Easy Reader
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio Analog LQ-139 vs Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex)
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) vs Casio Vintage Digital LA20WH
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) vs Casio MQ-24-1B
tier2High-intent comparison page
Continue comparing specs and pricing, or start a new shortlist with the comparison tool and browse pages.
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
You can compare up to 10 watches. Browse watches and click "Add to Compare" to add more.
