Skip to content

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) vs Timex Easy Reader

Side-by-side comparison of specifications and features

Casio Analog — White dial, resin case
CasioAnalog
TimexEasy Reader

Key Differences

Best Value
Casio Analog (Ref. MQ-24 · Unisex)
Starting from $20
Slimmest
Casio Analog (Ref. MQ-24 · Unisex)
7.8mm thick

See Both Watches on Your Wrist

Compare visual case presence and physical footprint on one shared wrist. Measure your top-down wrist width for a stronger result; lug-to-lug is used when the catalog has it.

Medium (6.7″)

Estimated top width: 56.7 mm

Preliminary range: 54.761.8 mm.

Wrist side

Left and right measurements are saved separately on this device.

Watch A

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex)

Round · 34.9mm · 38.8mm lug-to-lug

Visual presence

Moderate

Case covers 62% of your modeled wrist width.

Physical footprint

Clear space

Estimated clearance: 8.9 mm per side.

Case: 34.9mmLug-to-lug: 38.8mmLug width: 16mmThickness: 7.8mm
Open this size in the full fit chart →

Watch B

Timex Easy Reader

Round · 35mm · 40mm lug-to-lug

Visual presence

Moderate

Case covers 62% of your modeled wrist width.

Physical footprint

Clear space

Estimated clearance: 8.3 mm per side.

Case: 35mmLug-to-lug: 40mmLug width: 18mmThickness: 9mm
Open this size in the full fit chart →

Proportional guide only: visual presence and physical footprint do not predict comfort. Weight, thickness, caseback shape, rigid lugs, strap stiffness, wrist-bone prominence, wearing tension, bezel design, and case curvature change how a watch actually wears.

Price Comparison

Casio Analog
MSRP
$20
New
$30
Used
$12
Timex Easy Reader
MSRP
$35
New
$54
Used
$20
MSRP New (Amazon) Used (eBay)

Side-by-Side Specs

Start with the specifications that meaningfully differ. Expand the complete table for reference details and missing-data context.

Specification differences for Casio Analog, Timex Easy Reader
Specification
Analog
Easy Reader
Pricing
MSRPAnalog is $15.1 less at MSRP$20$35
New PriceAnalog is $24.4 less based on the current snapshot$30$54
Used Price (Low)Analog is $8 less at the low end$12$20
Used Price (High)$1,000$48
30-Day Trend+14.8%+10.1%
Used Price Range$12 - $1,000$20 - $48
Identity
StyleCasualDress, Casual
Dimensions
DiameterAnalog is 0.1mm smaller34.9mm35mm
ThicknessAnalog is 1.2mm thinner7.8mm9mm
Lug Width16mm18mm
Lug to Lug38.8mm40mm
Case
Case MaterialResinStainless Steel
CrystalAcrylicMineral Crystal
Dial
LuminousEasy Reader includes luminous markersNot included Included
5 specifications both watches share
Release Era1990s
MovementQuartz
Water Resistance30m (splash resistant)
BezelFixed
Dial ColorWhite

1 field is excluded from the differences view because one watch lacks comparable data. Use “All specs” to inspect those gaps.

Which Should You Buy?

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) and Timex Easy Reader can overlap on price or use case, but the buying decision usually comes down to casual character versus dress versatility, entry price versus premium finishing or specs. They both touch the casual use case, so smaller spec differences can matter more than brand preference.

Bottom line

There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use. Choose Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) if you are specifically shopping for a casual style watch; choose Timex Easy Reader if you are specifically shopping for a dress style watch.

Choose Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) when

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is a better fit for low-maintenance daily wear, casual styling.

Choose Timex Easy Reader when

Timex Easy Reader is a better fit for low-maintenance daily wear, dress styling.

Key Differences

Movement and upkeep

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): quartz movement

Timex Easy Reader: quartz movement

Both use the same movement type, so maintenance differences are limited and fit or feature details should decide the purchase.

Size and wearability

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): 34.9mm · L2L 38.8mm · 20g

Timex Easy Reader: 35mm · L2L 40mm

Their size profiles are relatively close, so fit comes down to shape, weight, and how each watch sits on your wrist.

Water resistance

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): 30m

Timex Easy Reader: 30m

Water resistance is similar on paper, so focus on fit, features, and price instead.

Price and value

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): $20

Timex Easy Reader: $30

There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.

Style and use case

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): casual

Timex Easy Reader: dress

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) leans more casual, while Timex Easy Reader pulls toward dress use case — pick the one that matches how you will actually wear it.

Crystal and materials

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex): acrylic crystal · resin

Timex Easy Reader: mineral crystal · steel

Crystal choice can change long-term wear expectations — one may prioritize scratch resistance while the other keeps cost or vintage feel in check.

Why These Watches Are Often Compared

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) and Timex Easy Reader get compared constantly because both are casual watches, they are within 0.1mm of each other in case width, they share the same quartz movement — so the spec sheet alone will not tell you which to buy.

The Differences You Will Notice in Daily Use

  • Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) uses a resin case, Timex Easy Reader a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels.
  • Lug-to-lug is 38.8mm on Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) and 40mm on Timex Easy Reader; that, more than case width, decides whether it overhangs a smaller wrist.
  • Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) has a acrylic crystal and Timex Easy Reader has a mineral — the mineral one resists scratches better over years of wear.
  • Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 7.8mm thick and Timex Easy Reader is 9mm — the slimmer one slides under a shirt cuff more easily.
  • Timex Easy Reader offers low-light legibility; the other does not.

Which One Feels More Premium

Timex Easy Reader — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) uses a resin case, Timex Easy Reader a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels.

Which One Should You Buy

Timex Easy Reader for most buyers — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) uses a resin case, Timex Easy Reader a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels. Go with Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) instead if you have a smaller wrist — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 38.8mm lug-to-lug vs 40mm.

Choose Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) If...

  • You are specifically shopping for a casual style watch.
  • You want the lower current entry price.

Choose Timex Easy Reader If...

  • You are specifically shopping for a dress style watch.
  • You are comfortable paying more for a stronger feature set.

Price and Value Notes

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is often the value play at current pricing, while Timex Easy Reader makes more sense if you will use its extra features regularly.

There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.

Where to Check Deals

Check current deals on Amazon and eBay using the buttons below — listing prices, seller quality, and condition can change quickly.

Check current deals on Amazon and eBay

Prices change often, so compare the latest listings and condition options before you buy.

WatchCompared may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links. This does not change your price.

Casio Analog

Check Price on AmazonOpens in new tab · Price may vary
Check Price on eBayFrom $20 · New & used listings

Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.

Timex Easy Reader

Check Price on AmazonOpens in new tab · Price may vary
Check Price on eBayFrom $30 · New & used listings

Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.

Comparison FAQ

Which one is better for smaller wrists?

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) — it is 38.8mm lug-to-lug versus 40mm, and lug-to-lug is what decides whether a watch overhangs a smaller wrist.

Which is better for swimming or rough daily wear?

They are rated the same, so water resistance will not decide this. Choose on strap material and how much you mind scratching the case.

Is the more expensive one worth it?

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is the value pick at roughly $11 less. Pay more only if a specific difference above matters to you — otherwise the cheaper one is the smarter buy. Confirm live listings, since marketplace pricing moves.

What is the actual difference between Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) and Timex Easy Reader?

Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) uses a resin case, Timex Easy Reader a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels. That is the difference you will notice day to day; the rest of the specs are close enough not to matter.

Which one should I buy?

Timex Easy Reader for most buyers — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) uses a resin case, Timex Easy Reader a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels. Go with Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) instead if you have a smaller wrist — Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) is 38.8mm lug-to-lug vs 40mm.

Evidence & Method

How we compared these watches

No WatchCompared hands-on test claimed
  • Catalog specifications are normalized into the same units before differences are calculated.
  • The verdict uses only populated fields and the source-backed observations listed here.
  • Missing evidence reduces the depth of the conclusion instead of being filled with assumptions.

This page currently relies on normalized catalog fields and calculated differences. No external reviewer observation is used in its verdict.

Related Comparisons

Compare tool

More Comparison Tools & Guides

Continue comparing specs and pricing, or start a new shortlist with the comparison tool and browse pages.

You can compare up to 10 watches. Browse watches and click "Add to Compare" to add more.