Watch A
Farer Lander IV GMT
Visual presence
BoldCase covers 70% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 5.8 mm per side.
Side-by-side comparison of specifications and features
Compare visual case presence and physical footprint on one shared wrist. Measure your top-down wrist width for a stronger result; lug-to-lug is used when the catalog has it.
Medium (6.7″)
Estimated top width: 56.7 mm
Preliminary range: 54.7–61.8 mm.
Watch A
Visual presence
BoldCase covers 70% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 5.8 mm per side.
Watch B
Visual presence
BoldCase covers 71% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 6.0 mm per side.
Proportional guide only: visual presence and physical footprint do not predict comfort. Weight, thickness, caseback shape, rigid lugs, strap stiffness, wrist-bone prominence, wearing tension, bezel design, and case curvature change how a watch actually wears. Non-round silhouettes use a verified family shape and catalog dimensions where available; missing case height or width is estimated from a conservative family aspect ratio.
Start with the specifications that meaningfully differ. Expand the complete table for reference details and missing-data context.
| Specification | Farer Lander IV GMT | Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| MSRPPRX Powermatic 80 is $600 less at MSRP | $1,295 | $695 |
| Identity | ||
| Style | gmt, Dress | Sports, Dress |
| Dimensions | ||
| DiameterLander IV GMT is 0.5mm smaller | 39.5mm | 40mm |
| ThicknessLander IV GMT is 0.1mm thinner | 10.8mm | 10.9mm |
| Lug to Lug | 45mm | 44.6mm |
| Case | ||
| Bezel | Bidirectional 24-hour | Fixed |
| Dial | ||
| Dial Color | Sea Green | Blue |
7 fields are excluded from the differences view because one watch lacks comparable data. Use “All specs” to inspect those gaps.
This Farer Lander IV GMT vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 comparison is less about a universal winner and more about gmt character versus sports versatility, entry price versus premium finishing or specs. Treat it as a value-versus-upgrade decision — confirm the extra spend solves a problem you will notice every week.
Bottom line
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use. Choose Farer Lander IV GMT if you are specifically shopping for a gmt style watch; choose Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 if you are specifically shopping for a sports style watch.
Choose Farer Lander IV GMT when
Farer Lander IV GMT is a better fit for mechanical-watch enthusiasts, gmt styling.
Choose Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 when
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 is a better fit for mechanical-watch enthusiasts, sports styling.
Movement and upkeep
Farer Lander IV GMT: automatic movement
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80: automatic movement
Both use the same movement type, so maintenance differences are limited and fit or feature details should decide the purchase.
Size and wearability
Farer Lander IV GMT: 39.5mm · L2L 45mm
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80: 40mm · L2L 44.6mm · 138g
Their size profiles are relatively close, so fit comes down to shape, weight, and how each watch sits on your wrist.
Water resistance
Farer Lander IV GMT: 100m
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80: 100m
Water resistance is similar on paper, so focus on fit, features, and price instead.
Price and value
Farer Lander IV GMT: $1,295
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80: $695
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.
Style and use case
Farer Lander IV GMT: gmt
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80: sports
Farer Lander IV GMT leans more gmt, while Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 pulls toward sports use case — pick the one that matches how you will actually wear it.
Crystal and materials
Farer Lander IV GMT: sapphire crystal · steel
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80: sapphire crystal · steel
Materials are broadly similar, so finish, fit, and price will matter more than the materials list alone.
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 is often the value play at current pricing, while Farer Lander IV GMT makes more sense if you will use its extra features regularly.
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.
Check current deals on Amazon and eBay using the buttons below — listing prices, seller quality, and condition can change quickly.
Prices change often, so compare the latest listings and condition options before you buy.
WatchCompared may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links. This does not change your price.
Farer Lander IV GMT
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Neither is clearly smaller: case width is 39.5mm vs 40mm and thickness 10.8mm vs 10.9mm. Pick on strap and looks instead — the size difference is not what will decide this for you.
They are rated the same, so water resistance will not decide this. Choose on strap material and how much you mind scratching the case.
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 is the value pick at roughly $600 less. Pay more only if a specific difference above matters to you — otherwise the cheaper one is the smarter buy. Confirm live listings, since marketplace pricing moves.
Evidence & Method
This page currently relies on normalized catalog fields and calculated differences. No external reviewer observation is used in its verdict.
Compare Watches
Start a new multi-watch comparison
Compare Watch Prices
US-focused price comparison workflow
Related Style Guide
Browse more dress watch picks
Related Budget Page
Compare similar watches in the same price band
Watch Buying Guides
Read movement, fit, and buying guides before deciding
Smartwatch Compare Hub
Compare Apple, Garmin, Samsung, and more if you are cross-shopping smartwatches
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Tissot PRX
tier2High-intent comparison page
Tissot PRX vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80
tier2High-intent comparison page
Seiko 5 Sports GMT vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80
tier2High-intent comparison page
Seiko Prospex SPB155 (Baby Alpinist) vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80
tier2High-intent comparison page
Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 vs Tissot Seastar 1000
tier2High-intent comparison page
Christopher Ward C63 Sealander vs Tissot PRX Powermatic 80
tier2High-intent comparison page
Continue comparing specs and pricing, or start a new shortlist with the comparison tool and browse pages.
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
You can compare up to 10 watches. Browse watches and click "Add to Compare" to add more.