Side-by-side comparison of specifications and features
Compare visual case presence and physical footprint on one shared wrist. Measure your top-down wrist width for a stronger result; lug-to-lug is used when the catalog has it.
Medium (6.7″)
Estimated top width: 56.7 mm
Preliminary range: 54.7–61.8 mm.
Watch A
Visual presence
ModerateCase covers 59% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 9.9 mm per side.
Watch B
Visual presence
ModerateCase covers 63% of your modeled wrist width.
Physical footprint
Clear spaceEstimated clearance: 8.5 mm per side.
Proportional guide only: visual presence and physical footprint do not predict comfort. Weight, thickness, caseback shape, rigid lugs, strap stiffness, wrist-bone prominence, wearing tension, bezel design, and case curvature change how a watch actually wears. Non-round silhouettes use a verified family shape and catalog dimensions where available; missing case height or width is estimated from a conservative family aspect ratio.
Start with the specifications that meaningfully differ. Expand the complete table for reference details and missing-data context.
| Specification | Casio A158 | Casio Vintage A700 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| MSRPA158 is $9.1 less at MSRP | $30 | $39 |
| Used Price (Low)A158 is $27.2 less at the low end | $25 | $52 |
| Used Price (High) | $170 | $246 |
| 30-Day Trend | ↑ +21.2% | ↓ -7.5% |
| Used Price Range | $25 - $170 | $52 - $246 |
| Identity | ||
| Style | Digital, Casual, Vintage | Digital, Vintage, Casual |
| Dimensions | ||
| DiameterA158 is 2.3mm smaller | 33.2mm | 35.5mm |
| Thickness | 8.2mm | N/A |
| Case | ||
| Case Material | Resin | Stainless Steel |
| Crystal | Acrylic | Mineral Crystal |
| Dial | ||
| Dial Color | Silver/Black | Black |
4 fields are excluded from the differences view because one watch lacks comparable data. Use “All specs” to inspect those gaps.
Casio A158 and Casio Vintage A700 can look close on a spec sheet, yet the tradeoffs that matter most are usually wrist presence versus easier fit. They both touch the digital and casual use case, so smaller spec differences can matter more than brand preference.
Bottom line
Fit is a real separator here — compare case width and lug-to-lug before deciding, especially if wrist comfort matters more than headline features. Choose Casio A158 if you want a smaller case footprint on the wrist; choose Casio Vintage A700 if you prefer more dial presence and a larger case feel.
Choose Casio A158 when
Casio A158 is a better fit for smaller wrists, low-maintenance daily wear, digital styling.
Choose Casio Vintage A700 when
Casio Vintage A700 is a better fit for buyers who want more wrist presence, low-maintenance daily wear, digital styling.
Movement and upkeep
Casio A158: quartz movement
Casio Vintage A700: quartz movement
Both use the same movement type, so maintenance differences are limited and fit or feature details should decide the purchase.
Size and wearability
Casio A158: 33.2mm · L2L 36.8mm · 46g
Casio Vintage A700: 35.5mm
Fit is a real separator here — compare case width and lug-to-lug before deciding, especially if wrist comfort matters more than headline features.
Water resistance
Casio A158: 30m
Casio Vintage A700: 30m
Water resistance is similar on paper, so focus on fit, features, and price instead.
Price and value
Casio A158: $30
Casio Vintage A700: $39
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.
Style and use case
Casio A158: digital
Casio Vintage A700: digital
Both lean into a similar digital use case — the choice is more about fit, features, and price than category.
Crystal and materials
Casio A158: acrylic crystal · resin
Casio Vintage A700: mineral crystal · steel
Crystal choice can change long-term wear expectations — one may prioritize scratch resistance while the other keeps cost or vintage feel in check.
Casio A158 and Casio Vintage A700 get compared constantly because both are digital/casual watches, they share the same quartz movement — so the spec sheet alone will not tell you which to buy.
Casio Vintage A700 — Casio A158 uses a resin case, Casio Vintage A700 a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels.
Casio Vintage A700 for most buyers — Casio A158 uses a resin case, Casio Vintage A700 a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels. Go with Casio A158 instead if Recognisability matters to you — Casio A158 reads as a shinier retro/vintage accessory rather than a plain utility digital.
Sources: https://theslenderwrist.com/casio-f91w-vs-a158w/
Casio A158 is often the value play at current pricing, while Casio Vintage A700 makes more sense if you will use its extra features regularly.
There is a real price gap here — treat the more expensive option as an upgrade decision and confirm whether the extra spend buys something you will notice in weekly use.
Check current deals on Amazon and eBay using the buttons below — listing prices, seller quality, and condition can change quickly.
Prices change often, so compare the latest listings and condition options before you buy.
WatchCompared may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links. This does not change your price.
Casio A158
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Casio Vintage A700
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Casio A158 — it is 33.2mm wide versus 35.5mm.
They are rated the same, so water resistance will not decide this. Choose on strap material and how much you mind scratching the case.
Casio A158 is the value pick at roughly $9 less. Pay more only if a specific difference above matters to you — otherwise the cheaper one is the smarter buy. Confirm live listings, since marketplace pricing moves.
Casio A158 uses a resin case, Casio Vintage A700 a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels. That is the difference you will notice day to day; the rest of the specs are close enough not to matter.
Casio Vintage A700 for most buyers — Casio A158 uses a resin case, Casio Vintage A700 a steel case — that changes both weight and how premium it feels. Go with Casio A158 instead if Recognisability matters to you — Casio A158 reads as a shinier retro/vintage accessory rather than a plain utility digital.
Evidence & Method
This page currently relies on normalized catalog fields and calculated differences. No external reviewer observation is used in its verdict.
Compare Watches
Start a new multi-watch comparison
Compare Watch Prices
US-focused price comparison workflow
Watch Fit Chart
Size and wrist-fit guidance
Related Style Guide
Browse more digital watch picks
Related Budget Page
Compare similar watches in the same price band
Watch Buying Guides
Read movement, fit, and buying guides before deciding
Casio A158 vs Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex)
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio Analog MQ-24 (unisex) vs Casio Vintage A700
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio A158 vs Casio Vintage Digital LA680
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio A158 vs Timex T80
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio A158 vs Casio Vintage Digital A159
tier2High-intent comparison page
Casio A158 vs Casio Calculator Watch
tier2High-intent comparison page
Continue comparing specs and pricing, or start a new shortlist with the comparison tool and browse pages.
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
Affiliate links — WatchCompared earns a commission on qualifying purchases. This doesn't affect your price.
You can compare up to 10 watches. Browse watches and click "Add to Compare" to add more.